The High Court on Monday upheld the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, ruling the process constitutional but awarding him KSh50 million for rights violation.

• The court found the impeachment process constitutionally valid and final, distinguishing it from a governor's impeachment.
• Rigathi Gachagua was awarded KSh50 million in constitutional damages by the Senate for infringement of his right to a fair hearing.
• The court also affirmed the legality of Prof. Kithure Kindiki's appointment as the new Deputy President.

The High Court has ruled that the National Assembly conducted adequate public participation during the impeachment proceedings against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

• The High Court determined that the National Assembly followed the proper procedures for public involvement.
• Key parties involved include the High Court and the National Assembly.
• This ruling impacts the legitimacy of the impeachment process initiated against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

The High Court has ruled that Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was properly nominated, dismissing a case that sought to challenge his position.

• The crucial finding by the court was that the nomination process was lawful.
• Key figures in the case include Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and Justice Mwangi Njoroge, who delivered the ruling.
• This decision clears a significant hurdle for Deputy President Gachagua amidst ongoing political maneuvering.

The High Court has ruled that the Senate violated Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua's rights by failing to adjourn proceedings when he fell ill. This decision stems from an incident where the Deputy President requested an adjournment due to ill health, which the court found was improperly handled.

• The High Court found a violation of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua's rights.
• The Senate is the key organization involved in the ruling.
• The ruling highlights the importance of respecting the rights of individuals, even during parliamentary proceedings.

The High Court has upheld the Senate's impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, dismissing petitions that challenged his removal from office.

• The ruling on Monday, June 8, 2026, confirmed parliament acted within the law and met constitutional requirements for public participation.
• Key individual involved: Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
• The court found parliamentary proceedings, including the use of Standing Orders and public participation measures, to be lawful, dismissing claims of bias against legislators.

The High Court in Nairobi has upheld the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, ruling that Parliament acted within the Constitution. However, the court awarded Gachagua Sh50 million for a violation of his right to a fair hearing during the Senate proceedings.

• The High Court awarded Rigathi Gachagua Sh50 million in damages.
• Key individuals involved are former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and the Senate.
• The court found the Senate violated Gachagua's right to a fair hearing by declining to adjourn proceedings for written submissions.

The High Court has upheld the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. However, the court has awarded him Sh50 million in damages.

• Sh50 million in damages awarded to former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
• The High Court made the ruling concerning Rigathi Gachagua's impeachment.
• The decision affirms the impeachment but grants financial compensation.

Lawyer Ndegwa Njiru has issued a stern warning, stating that he and his colleagues will not stand by and watch the Courts allegedly preside over the "funeral" of Kenya's Constitution.

• The lawyer expressed strong disapproval of the Courts' current trajectory.
• Ndegwa Njiru is the key figure making these allegations.
• The statement implies a concern over potential judicial actions undermining constitutional principles.

The High Court has delivered a significant judgment concerning the impeachment proceedings against former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

• The ruling addresses the legal basis and procedural fairness of the planned impeachment.
• Key figures involved include former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and the judiciary.
• This decision could have substantial implications for the political landscape and the powers of legislative bodies.

The High Court has reportedly upheld the impeachment of Gachagua, a development that has drawn reactions from lawyers. The article details these legal responses following the court's decision.

• The High Court's ruling confirmed the ousting of Gachagua.
• Key individuals involved include Gachagua and various lawyers.
• The article references NTV Kenya and the Daily Nation for further details on this developing story.

Lawyer Tom Ojienda has lauded the High Court's decision to uphold the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

• The High Court's judgment is described as a "sound decision" by Ojienda.
• Key figures involved include lawyer Tom Ojienda and Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
• The ruling affirmed the legality of the impeachment proceedings against the Deputy President.

Lawyer Wangui has asserted that Deputy President Gachagua’s right to a fair trial was compromised during his impeachment proceedings.

• The lawyer alleges violation of Gachagua's fair trial rights.
• Key figure involved is Deputy President Gachagua.
• The context revolves around the impeachment process he faced.

A recent court ruling has highlighted significant flaws in Kenya's impeachment process, according to Elias Mutuma. The article also mentions an ongoing nationwide matatu strike protesting rising fuel prices.

• The court's decision has exposed deep cracks in the impeachment procedure.
• Key figure is Elias Mutuma.
• The ruling comes amid a nationwide matatu strike due to rising fuel prices.

Lawyer Evans stated the Constitution was "slaughtered" following an event related to Deputy President Gachagua, though the specific details of this event are not provided.

• Key issue: A perceived violation of the Constitution.
• Involved figure: Deputy President Gachagua.
• Related context: The article also mentions a nationwide matatu strike protesting rising fuel prices, suggesting a potential connection to the lawyer's statement or a separate ongoing event.

The High Court has ruled that the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was constitutional. The decision, read for over nine hours, involved judges Eric Ogola, Antony Mrima, and Frida Mugambi.

• Fiducia awarded to Gachagua: KSh 5 million
• Key parties involved: Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and the High Court
• Notable detail: The court's ruling was delivered after a lengthy nine-hour session.

The legal team for Gachagua has announced their intention to file an appeal following a court decision, asserting their client did not receive justice.

• Gachagua's legal team will file an appeal.
• The Senators' legal team is prepared to respond to any appeal.
• The appeal is based on the claim that Gachagua was not afforded justice.

The Senate plans to appeal a High Court ruling that awarded former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua Ksh50 million in damages for a violation of his fair hearing rights during impeachment proceedings.

• Senate Majority Leader Aaron Cheruiyot stated the Senate will appeal the ruling, asserting Gachagua was given adequate opportunity to defend himself.
• The High Court had found that Gachagua's right to a fair hearing was infringed when he was denied an adjournment during the Senate trial.
• Despite this violation, the High Court upheld the impeachment, ruling that Parliament acted within its legal mandate.

Senior Counsel Charles Kanjama argues that the High Court should have nullified the impeachment process against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, citing a flawed procedure.

• The impeachment attempt involved accusations of gross misconduct.
• Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was the subject of the impeachment proceedings.
• Senior Counsel Charles Kanjama is advocating for the nullification based on procedural irregularities.

Despite a recent High Court ruling upholding his impeachment, former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is still eligible to run for president in 2027, according to the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) President Charles Kanjama.

• The LSK President, Charles Kanjama, clarified that Gachagua can still vie for any seat, including the presidency.
• According to Article 99(3) of the Constitution, disqualification from office only occurs after all legal avenues of appeal are exhausted.
• Gachagua's legal team has indicated they will appeal the ruling to the Court of Appeal, meaning his eligibility is unaffected during pending appeals.