DPP Ingonga defends withdrawal of high-profile corruption cases

According to Ingonga, such decisions are based on the evidence presented and the need to safeguard public funds when cases do not meet the evidential threshold for a conviction. .....
✨ Key Highlights
DPP Renson Ingonga has defended the withdrawal of high-profile corruption cases, asserting such decisions are based on insufficient evidence and aimed at safeguarding public funds from potential malicious prosecution claims. He urged investigative bodies to provide robust evidence, explaining that charges are approved when a conviction is likely.
- Ingonga stated that early withdrawals prevent the state from losing billions of shillings in compensation for malicious prosecution.
- The Director of Public Prosecutions highlighted clashes with the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) over thoroughly investigated cases, citing the Natembeya case where EACC claimed Ksh. 1.4 billion but evidence supported only Ksh. 3 million.
- The DPP's office has faced sharp criticism and legal battles due to these withdrawals, published on August 29, 2025.
Continue Reading
Read the complete article from Citizen Digital