K
Originally published by Kenyans
📰 Read Full Article
top
February 18, 2026
1mo ago

High Court Issues Directives on Petition Challenging Ruto-Sakaja Deal

High Court Issues Directives on Petition Challenging Ruto-Sakaja Deal

President Ruto and Governor Sakaja on Tuesday signed a cooperation deal which saw the national and county governments commit to joint management of key urban services...

✨ Key Highlights

The High Court has declared a petition challenging the cooperation deal between the national government and Nairobi County as urgent, setting the stage for a hearing on March 16. This agreement, signed between President William Ruto and Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja, is being scrutinized for its constitutional implications.

  • The petition, filed on February 18 by two Kenyans, argues the deal undermines devolution by allowing the national government to intervene directly in county functions.
  • Justice Bahati Mwamuyi certified the case as urgent, acknowledging its public interest and potential impact on Nairobi residents.
  • Respondents have until February 27 to file their responses, with subsequent submissions scheduled for March 13.
  • The petitioners are seeking conservatory orders to halt the agreement's implementation and requesting empanelment under Article 165(4) of the Constitution.

Continue Reading

Read the complete article from Kenyans

📰 Read Full Article

Part of the Day's Coverage

High Court Declares Petition Challenging Ksh80 Billion Ruto-Sakaja Nairobi Deal as Urgent - February 2026

President William Ruto and Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja signed a Ksh80 billion cooperation pact to support development projects in the city. President Ruto assured residents that the agreement is not a takeover of county functions and that Nairobi remains under Governor Sakaja's leadership. However, a petition was filed challenging the constitutionality of the cooperation deal. The High Court has declared this petition urgent, setting a hearing for March 16. Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna has also opposed the deal, labeling it an unlawful power grab and suggesting that conditional grants would be a more appropriate way for the national government to provide support.

5 stories in this topic
View Full Coverage
Advertisement
Advertisement